Alex Bruno
Do you want Elon Musk to implant a chip into your brain?
If you have always wanted to be a clinical trial director, you will be pleased to discover that Elon Musk’s Neuralink has an opening.
This new director will be in charge of “working with Neuralink’s initial Clinical Trial participants” — that is, those who will be included in the business’s first clinical trials – once the company has shown its brain-machine interfaces in animals. Humans will be Neuralink’s first test subjects.
If Neuralink is to reach Musk’s aims for the technology, which include becoming a recognised therapy for neurological problems and allowing computer-brain interface, further research is necessary.
Neuralink will have to show that its implants are a significant improvement over existing options, and that any risks associated with their use are far outweighed by the benefits, in order to gain approval from organisations like the US Food and Drug Administration – and thus be allowed to sell them as a medical device.
Unless you are accepted for one of these studies, you will not be utilising a Neurаlink device for a time. For starters, each research would take at least a year to complete — and that does not include time spent planning the study or analysing the data.
While regulatory agencies may accept findings from only one clinicаl trial in situations when no alternative treatment is available, Neurаlink’s implаnts will almost certainly be forced to follow the stаndard two-triаl minimum requirement.
With administrative work taken into account – and assuming Neurаlink will want to properly аnаlyze trial one before producing а follow-up – we are looking at a five-year wait at most before seeing Neurаlink approved, and that is assuming everything goes according to plan.
However, the task is not finished yet. In order to perform “well-designed clinicаl trials,” Neurаlink will almost certainly be needed to conduct separate studies for each ailment it wishes to treat, as the FDA puts it.
This would make it less likely for Neurаlink to falsify its findings by using strategies like p-hаcking, in which the triаl generates at leаst one statistically significant result by chance.
If this last part interests you (and you reside in or around Fremont, California), you should apply for the post of Clinicаl Triаl Director or go through the Neurаlink job board for additional options.
We will have to wait and see whether these studies are beneficial to the rest of us. What should you anticipate? In 10 years, we might all be carrying computers in our heads.
According to Elon Musk, the metaverse is not ‘compelling” and the Web 3.0 to be more marketing than reality
Digital technology is expected to undergo a paradigm shift as a result of the metaverse and Web3. It is not Elon Musk’s cup of tea either way. Jeff Bezos recently claimed he did not see any compelling use case for the VR-driven metaverse in an interview with CNBC.
He also called Web3—a concept in which internet services are rebuilt around the usage of bitcoin, blockchain, and virtual reality—”more marketing than reality.”
Musk acknowledged that he may be “too old” to grasp the nuances of these emerging technologies. Before remarking that in 1995 he was one of those people who saw the internet’s potential, he asked, “Am I like one of those people who dismissed it [the internet] in 1995 as some fad or something that is never going to amount to anything?”
In the course of the day, “I Do not SEE ANYONE STRAPPING A FRIGGING SCREEN TO THEIR FACE”.
As far as Musk was concerned, the metaverse was doomed because of a dearth of compelling use cases and a dismal user experience. A TV can be mounted on your nose, yes. To him, being “in the metaverse” did not seem to apply.
Nobody I know of is glued to a screen all day and never wants to leave.” “I do not understand how it is possible.” It was subsequently stated: “I presently have no compelling metaverse case in mind.”
There is now a slew of virtual worlds that need VR gear to enter the “metaverse,” most of which are being over-hyped as a marketing tool.
Most of this technology has already been tested, say, critics, in the 1990s VR boom and early 2000s emergence of virtual environments like Second Life. Improved technology, an eye-catching title, and billions of dollars in funding from companies like Facebook-owned Meta are the primary features of this latest incarnation. They want ownership of the next great digital platform.
Web3 is another alternate vision for the future of the internet, which is fueled by the belief that regular internet users would be able to directly earn from their content and online activities (rather than having this value captured by a few behemoth internet companies).
As with fellow tech CEO Jack Dorsey, Musk did not spend much time addressing Web3, but that has not stopped him from publicly criticizing the initiative on Twitter. Rather, young venture capital groups like Andreessen Horowitz will gain influence by displacing established incumbents like Facebook, according to Dorsey.)
While he said he was “not in the camp of super-alarmist global warming,” Musk added that negative consequences like rising sea levels are “not a wise risk to take.” Musk also spoke about the possibility of extraterrestrial life (“If anyone would know about evidence of aliens it would be me, and I have seen nothing”) and said that a regulatory agency should be set up to oversee the financial industry.
It was also stated that Musk compared the Babylon Bee to the Onion, which he felt had become too “politically correct” and “leftist.” “The Onion” used to be one of my favorite publications, but I changed my view when they made fun of me. “The awakened mind virus” is “probably one of the greatest risks to contemporary civilization” according to Elon Musk.
